Rural Action Forestry wrote:Hard to say how it will go. It could give law enforcement an opportunity to make some publcity around poaching convictions. For those that went to the NC Ginseng conference last December will recall Jim Corbin talking about how when they heavily publicized poaching convictions the amount of poaching incidents dropped the following year.
But it could also drive those poachers more toward private land and exacerbate those problems.
The Cherokee NF sounds pretty big (600 miles of trail, 150 miles of the Appalachian Trail, encompassing almost 700,000 acres) so 40 permits does seem low. To compare the Wayne National Forest Here in Ohio has only about 250,000 acres, spread across 3 noncontiguous tracts. Annually they are issuing about 65-70 harvest permits forest wide, with the allowable take being 95 plants or 1/2 a fresh Lb. for ginseng. I contacted our Forest Botanist at the Wayne this week once I saw that more forests were issuing announcements about these changes. Haven't heard back yet, so still not sure if there will be similar changes here in Ohio. I know that they have been getting pressure from the national office over the last few years to further restrict harvests, so we will see what happens. It's getting pretty late in the year for regulatory changes so if they are going to happen it will be very soon.
While the Cherokee NF is fairly large, approximately 1/3rd of it is comprised of Wilderness areas where no Ginseng harvesting is allowed, so this makes matters even worse for us. In comparison, North Carolina probably has 4 to 5 times as much NF land or more. I didn't search online for each of their' sizes in square miles, so I don't know exactly how much nf land there is in NC but there is a lot.
Frank