Mr wild wrote:I agree with you on the WILD ginseng. It needs protected. Just dont agree with woodsgrown, wild simulated and cultivated being treated the same.
I understand what you are saying, but again, that water is under the bridge. Once a species is listed on CITES, to my understanding, all types of that species - with the distinction being wild or artificially propagated - will from there on out be regulated at some point.
With all due respect, that argument was settled 37 years ago when american ginseng was listed on CITES Appendix II.
And due to the ginseng horticulture practices, in many cases it's hard to distinguish between wild and wild simulated patches. Then if so much more of the ginseng is sold (but looks wild? or wild sim) under wild that isn't, then why aren't more open they are ginseng growers.
So, again, it's not that simple. I wish it was, but it's not. And woodsgrown cultivation can impact (and unless documented) wild harvest (oh, I'll just get my ginseng I'm growing, and throw in some wild)... and don't tell me that hasn't happened.
Again, if it hadn't - we would be having this discussion.