I guess nobody has ever had a problem with it.
and...
I would think any reasonable person would not care if the rules were broken as long as it wasnt hurting wild ginseng.
That is the way you and I think...as well as most of the folks who understand ginseng. The thing we must remember though, is that the folks making the rules don't always understand ginseng the way we do. Then, when you add another whole layer of governmental administratiion above our state folks....it can really be a challenge to get them to understand what we see as simple common sense.
I used to have a brother in law who was an engineer. I asked him one day what an engineer really does. Being a contractor at the time, he told me that if I were to nail a 2x4 to the wall with a single nail on one end, I would intuitively know that the 2x4 would swing down pivoting on the single nail. He went on to explain that an engineer would come to the same conclusion, but would have to do studies on the nature and magnitude of the natural and not so natural forces which were influencing the movement of the lumber.
Having a foot in all camps (ginseng grower, dealer, administrative and law enforcment) I understand how frustrating this is, but at the same time understand the administrative side who look for the engineers to explain things to them with proof and facts rather than just opinion and preference.
Right now, one of the statistical facts the Division of Management Authority is looking at is if the state agencies responsible for the ginseng program are actually actively enforcing their laws. Another thing they are looking at, is the number of violations that show up. So, what we see as a minor technical violation which doesn't harm anything, they see as a clear disregard for the law in general and just another example of why harvest shoul be banned to protect the ginseng species.
This stuff gets just plain maddening.