Hi Hugh,
I don't mean to be confusing...I\"m sorry.
Looking at these laws and the subtile differences in them from state to state is indeed confusing. I'm not an attorney, but i am a cop. As such, I'm fairly used to reading codified ordinances the way they were intended.
Here are the definitions from Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
Ohio
As used in sections 1533.86 to 1533.90 of the Revised Code:
(A) ?Ginseng? means the plant Panax quinquefolius L., also known as Panax quinquefolium L., commonly known as American ginseng.
(
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0da/6b0dacef89fb980439aeecc1cbae043e223d76f2" alt="B) B)"
?Wild ginseng? means ginseng that grows in an uncultivated state and in its natural habitat whether the plant occurs naturally from that habitat or was introduced or increased in abundance by sowing ginseng seed or transplanting ginseng plants from other areas and performing no other cultivation practices.
(C) ?Cultivated ginseng? means ginseng that grows or has been grown in tilled beds under the shade of artificial structures or natural shade and is cultivated according to standard ginseng horticultural practices.
(D) ?Harvest? means to cut, pick, dig, root up, gather, or otherwise collect ginseng.
Kentucky
As used in KRS 246.660, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
(1) \"Harvest\" means to take any part of the ginseng plant while the plant is living; and
(2) \"Ginseng\" means any part of the American ginseng plant known as Panax quinquefolius.
Tennessee
Tennessee Annotated Code 70-8-202. Part definitions
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) ?Cultivated ginseng? means ginseng growing in tilled beds under shade of artificial structures or under natural shade where shrubs or other competing vegetation have been removed and the soil has been prepared to enhance the growth of the ginseng;
(3) ?Ginseng? means the plant panax quinquefolius of the araliaceae family;
(7) ?Wild ginseng? means ginseng occurring in its native woodland habitat, and includes the ginseng that is growing naturally in that habitat or that was introduced or increased in abundance in its natural habitat by sowing ginseng seed or by transplanting ginseng plants from other woodland areas.
Now, it is important to note that the US Fish & Wildlife Service is the originator of most of the rules with which all of the states must adhere if they wish to export ginseng at all. The September 1st opening, the five year old plants, and the wild simulated being classified at this point as wild are all part of their requirements for the approval of a state's program to allow for export from that state under the commerce clause.
Now, that said, as a law enforcment officer myself who has the authority to enforce ginseng laws if the occasion should arrise, I am going to look for the intent of the law rather than the letter of the law per se.
For instance, the purpose of the September 1st opening date is to ensure that most of the berries on the plants are ripe should the plant be legally harvested. The requirement to replant the berries in the area of the harvested plant shows the intent of the law. Some states specify how many feet away you can plant the berries, others do not, but all require them to be planted in the 'area' of the parent plant. This is to ensure the reseeding of the wild ginseng species. Early harvest aborts that process and harms the reproductive capacity of the species.
If the goofy conditions like this year were to cause the berries to ripen early on a wild simulated stand, or a truly wild stand for that matter, and you were to pluck the berries and plant them right there in the area where the parent plant is growing (say 50 feet or so max) you are indeed complying with the intent of the law. With that argument, and no ginseng berries in your pocket if you were to be stopped, I would suggest no court is going to convict you of harvesting ginseng out of season.
My argument is that plucking ripe berries early -which may be a form of 'harvest' according to some of the state's laws, is a non issue as long as you plant those berries right there as the law was created to encourage you to do.
Short answer...I would never write a summons for someone who I caught planting ripe ginseng berries a week or three before season as long as he or she was otherwise complying with the applicable laws.